Right and wrong are significant concepts in the logical realm of natural scientists; however, the logical world of managers operates differently. The criteria for assessing situations and the conclusions drawn from evaluating decisions are more complex and varied. Management primarily focuses on people, who possess not only natural attributes but also social characteristics. Consequently, people’s behavior is influenced by culture, which also affects management strategies. Different cultures create diverse standards for judging management strategies as good or bad, right or wrong, effective or ineffective.

Some individuals like to draw parallels between management and clinical practices. However, management involves not just individuals but also groups of people. Unlike a clinician, who deals with a patient’s personal and physical system, managers confront a more dynamic and interconnected system of interactions. While statistical data can provide valuable insights for management, relying solely on sample statistics can often lead to misleading conclusions that may be far more common than we realize.

Confucius once said, “The gentleman is harmonious but different, while the villain is the same but not harmonious.” This statement warrants careful consideration by project managers. A project’s essence lies in its function as a collaborative platform for multiple stakeholders who possess different specialties, needs, and cultural backgrounds. Given that every project involves a certain degree of innovation, the scientific aspect of project management—particularly the elements influenced by the logical thinking of natural scientists—is often less significant than that of operational management.

F.W. Taylor’s principles of scientific management can be effective for operations that depend on manual labor. However, placing too much emphasis on a scientific approach to project management can actually impede success in projects that operate in constantly changing environments and involve diverse cultures.

Culture is an unspoken rule that has developed over a long period. It is not deliberately shaped by individuals but rather evolves naturally, similar to the natural world. This evolution aligns with the fundamental principle of survival of the fittest. In a time-sensitive project, attempting to eliminate the cultural differences among participants is impractical; achieving uniformity is not possible. The challenge of project management lies in finding ways for all parties involved to retain their unique cultures while implementing strict measures that establish unified rules for coordination. Balancing these aspects is essential for improving efficiency and represents a contradiction that effective project management must address.

An effective strategy for resolving this contradiction is to establish fundamental principles of project governance. With nearly 200 countries worldwide, each with its own distinct cultures, religions, and political systems, the necessity for cooperation among nations remains critical. It is essential to minimize violent conflicts to prevent the recurrence of global tragedies, such as the Second World War. The Charter of the United Nations serves as a foundational principle for seeking common ground among its member countries.

Within a country, there can be contradictions arising from different living habits, local laws, and regulations influenced by various nationalities and regions. To unify the country and prevent these contradictions from causing significant issues, each nation has its own constitution, which serves as the fundamental principle that must be followed.

Similarly, projects require a solid governance agreement among all stakeholders established through a Project Charter or Project Canvas. This agreement is essential before implementing effective management strategies, ensuring they align with the project’s specific circumstances while adhering to these established principles.

Challenges often arise in project management, such as immediate failure upon taking control and chaos when control is released. These issues often stem from an ineffective project governance mechanism centered around the project canvas. Focusing excessively on non-essential matters can lead to failure as soon as control is assumed. Conversely, if too much emphasis is placed on essential principles, it may result in chaos.

The Chinese proverb says “either the west wind overpowers the east wind, or the east wind overpowers the west wind.” It suggests a denial of the deep-rooted cultural differences. It reflects a naive belief that these differences can be suppressed and unified through power and institutional means. Such an approach can backfire, as it breeds resistance in environments of oppression.

Project management thrives on the interplay of diverse perspectives, and each cultural viewpoint brings unique insights and practices that can enhance project outcomes. By establishing shared principles that respect these differences, project managers can foster a collaborative environment where diverse cultural strengths are harnessed effectively. In a globalized world, respecting and integrating varied cultural approaches not only promotes harmony but also ensures projects are resilient, adaptable, and universally relevant. Adopting shared governance principles that honor cultural diversity is essential in navigating the complexities of today’s projects and in paving the way for successful, inclusive outcomes.

See the global network of the IPMA Member Associations in 70 countries worldwide: https://ipma.world/ipma-membership/